cmc banner
Mentorship Interventions
Internal Consistency and Application of a Mentee Survey to Assess Mentor Competencies in an Academic Medical Center across Demographic Groups

Hall, G., Corsino, L., Mack, M., Hall, R., Sloane, R., Sullivan, B., Hough, H., Thomas, K., & Colon-Emeric, C.

Mentorship Interventions Across Career Stages in Biomedical and Health Sciences Fields [Special Issue], The Chronicle of Mentoring & Coaching, 8(1), 169–177 (2024).
https://doi.org/10.62935/of1528

 
Citation (APA):

Hall, G., Corsino, L., Mack, M., Hall, R., Sloane, R., Sullivan, B., Hough, H., Thomas, K., & Colon-Emeric, C. (2024). Internal consistency and application of a mentee survey to assess mentor competencies in an academic medical center across demographic groups. The Chronicle of Mentoring & Coaching, 8(1), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.62935/of1528

Abstract

The National Academies of Science stresses the importance of research mentoring. We assessed the internal consistency and application of a novel 33 item mentor evaluation survey and explored differences across subgroups. The survey was administered annually to mentees. The response rate was 17.8% for a sample of 710 respondents. The survey exhibited strong internal validity with Cronbach Alpha > 0.89 for each subscale. Overall scores across the three domains were high. Basic Science trainees scored their mentor significantly lower than those in Translational or Clinical Science across domains (0.11-0.25 points). Underrepresented Racial Ethnic Groups (UREG) trainee scores were significantly lower in academic guidance and personal communication. Women had lower scores in 4 out of 5 domains. The survey is a modified instrument to assess mentee experience, although further validation against mentee outcomes is needed.

 

Article

Join our mailing list to stay up to date on our upcoming events!


SUBSCRIBE TO THE UNM MENTORING INSTITUTE:

Thanks for signing up!